0.11/0.12	% Problem    : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0.
0.63/0.71	% Command    : eprover-ho %s --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --free-numbers -auto-schedule -p --cpu-limit=%d --neg-ext=all --pos-ext=all --ext-sup-max-depth=2 --schedule-kind=CASC
0.70/0.91	% Computer   : n027.cluster.edu
0.70/0.91	% Model      : x86_64 x86_64
0.70/0.91	% CPU        : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
0.70/0.91	% Memory     : 8042.1875MB
0.70/0.91	% OS         : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
0.70/0.91	% CPULimit   : 1200
0.70/0.91	% WCLimit    : 120
0.70/0.91	% DateTime   : Tue Jul 13 12:38:26 EDT 2021
0.70/0.91	% CPUTime    : 
0.70/0.91	% Number of cores: 8
0.70/0.91	% Python version: Python 3.6.8
0.70/0.91	# Version: 2.6rc1-ho
0.75/1.03	# SinE strategy is gf600_h_gu_R05_F100_L20000
0.75/1.03	# Trying AutoSched0 for 59 seconds
5.92/6.12	# AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S0Y
5.92/6.12	# and selection function SelectMaxLComplexAvoidPosPred.
5.92/6.12	#
5.92/6.12	# Preprocessing time       : 0.630 s
5.92/6.12	# Presaturation interreduction done
5.92/6.12	
5.92/6.12	# Proof found!
5.92/6.12	# SZS status Theorem
5.92/6.12	# SZS output start CNFRefutation
5.92/6.12	thf(conj_thm_2Eset__relation_2Erel__to__reln__inv, conjecture, ![X10:del, X19:del, X195:$i]:((ap @ (c_2Eset__relation_2Ereln__to__rel @ X10 @ X19) @ (ap @ (c_2Eset__relation_2Erel__to__reln @ X10 @ X19) @ X195))=(X195)<=mem @ X195 @ (arr @ X10 @ (arr @ X19 @ bool))), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', conj_thm_2Eset__relation_2Erel__to__reln__inv)).
5.92/6.12	thf(conj_thm_2Eset__relation_2Erel__to__reln__IS__UNCURRY, axiom, ![X10:del, X19:del]:(c_2Eset__relation_2Erel__to__reln @ X10 @ X19)=(c_2Epair_2EUNCURRY @ X10 @ X19 @ bool), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', conj_thm_2Eset__relation_2Erel__to__reln__IS__UNCURRY)).
5.92/6.12	thf(conj_thm_2Eset__relation_2Ereln__to__rel__IS__CURRY, axiom, ![X10:del, X19:del]:(c_2Eset__relation_2Ereln__to__rel @ X10 @ X19)=(c_2Epair_2ECURRY @ X10 @ X19 @ bool), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', conj_thm_2Eset__relation_2Ereln__to__rel__IS__CURRY)).
5.92/6.12	thf(conj_thm_2Epair_2ECURRY__UNCURRY__THM, axiom, ![X10:del, X19:del, X76:del, X45:$i]:(mem @ X45 @ (arr @ X10 @ (arr @ X19 @ X76))=>(ap @ (c_2Epair_2ECURRY @ X10 @ X19 @ X76) @ (ap @ (c_2Epair_2EUNCURRY @ X10 @ X19 @ X76) @ X45))=(X45)), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/ITP001/ITP014^5.ax', conj_thm_2Epair_2ECURRY__UNCURRY__THM)).
5.92/6.12	thf(c_0_4, negated_conjecture, ~(![X10:del, X19:del, X195:$i]:(mem @ X195 @ (arr @ X10 @ (arr @ X19 @ bool))=>(ap @ (c_2Eset__relation_2Ereln__to__rel @ X10 @ X19) @ (ap @ (c_2Eset__relation_2Erel__to__reln @ X10 @ X19) @ X195))=(X195))), inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conj_thm_2Eset__relation_2Erel__to__reln__inv])])).
5.92/6.12	thf(c_0_5, negated_conjecture, (mem @ esk219_0 @ (arr @ esk217_0 @ (arr @ esk218_0 @ bool))&(ap @ (c_2Eset__relation_2Ereln__to__rel @ esk217_0 @ esk218_0) @ (ap @ (c_2Eset__relation_2Erel__to__reln @ esk217_0 @ esk218_0) @ esk219_0))!=(esk219_0)), inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])])])).
5.92/6.12	thf(c_0_6, plain, ![X10114:del, X10115:del]:(c_2Eset__relation_2Erel__to__reln @ X10114 @ X10115)=(c_2Epair_2EUNCURRY @ X10114 @ X10115 @ bool), inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[conj_thm_2Eset__relation_2Erel__to__reln__IS__UNCURRY])).
5.92/6.12	thf(c_0_7, plain, ![X10129:del, X10130:del]:(c_2Eset__relation_2Ereln__to__rel @ X10129 @ X10130)=(c_2Epair_2ECURRY @ X10129 @ X10130 @ bool), inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[conj_thm_2Eset__relation_2Ereln__to__rel__IS__CURRY])).
5.92/6.12	thf(c_0_8, negated_conjecture, (ap @ (c_2Eset__relation_2Ereln__to__rel @ esk217_0 @ esk218_0) @ (ap @ (c_2Eset__relation_2Erel__to__reln @ esk217_0 @ esk218_0) @ esk219_0))!=(esk219_0), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])).
5.92/6.12	thf(c_0_9, plain, ![X1:del, X2:del]:(c_2Eset__relation_2Erel__to__reln @ X1 @ X2)=(c_2Epair_2EUNCURRY @ X1 @ X2 @ bool), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])).
5.92/6.12	thf(c_0_10, plain, ![X1:del, X2:del]:(c_2Eset__relation_2Ereln__to__rel @ X1 @ X2)=(c_2Epair_2ECURRY @ X1 @ X2 @ bool), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7])).
5.92/6.12	thf(c_0_11, plain, ![X11412:del, X11413:del, X11414:del, X11415:$i]:(~mem @ X11415 @ (arr @ X11412 @ (arr @ X11413 @ X11414))|(ap @ (c_2Epair_2ECURRY @ X11412 @ X11413 @ X11414) @ (ap @ (c_2Epair_2EUNCURRY @ X11412 @ X11413 @ X11414) @ X11415))=(X11415)), inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[conj_thm_2Epair_2ECURRY__UNCURRY__THM])])).
5.92/6.12	thf(c_0_12, negated_conjecture, (ap @ (c_2Epair_2ECURRY @ esk217_0 @ esk218_0 @ bool) @ (ap @ (c_2Epair_2EUNCURRY @ esk217_0 @ esk218_0 @ bool) @ esk219_0))!=(esk219_0), inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_8, c_0_9]), c_0_10])).
5.92/6.12	thf(c_0_13, plain, ![X1:del, X2:del, X4:$i, X10:del]:((ap @ (c_2Epair_2ECURRY @ X1 @ X2 @ X10) @ (ap @ (c_2Epair_2EUNCURRY @ X1 @ X2 @ X10) @ X4))=(X4)|~mem @ X4 @ (arr @ X1 @ (arr @ X2 @ X10))), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11])).
5.92/6.12	thf(c_0_14, negated_conjecture, mem @ esk219_0 @ (arr @ esk217_0 @ (arr @ esk218_0 @ bool)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])).
5.92/6.12	thf(c_0_15, negated_conjecture, ($false), inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12, c_0_13]), c_0_14])]), ['proof']).
5.92/6.12	# SZS output end CNFRefutation
5.92/6.12	# Proof object total steps             : 16
5.92/6.12	# Proof object clause steps            : 7
5.92/6.12	# Proof object formula steps           : 9
5.92/6.12	# Proof object conjectures             : 7
5.92/6.12	# Proof object clause conjectures      : 4
5.92/6.12	# Proof object formula conjectures     : 3
5.92/6.12	# Proof object initial clauses used    : 5
5.92/6.12	# Proof object initial formulas used   : 4
5.92/6.12	# Proof object generating inferences   : 1
5.92/6.12	# Proof object simplifying inferences  : 4
5.92/6.12	# Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
5.92/6.12	# Parsed axioms                        : 3387
5.92/6.12	# Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 811
5.92/6.12	# Initial clauses                      : 6915
5.92/6.12	# Removed in clause preprocessing      : 887
5.92/6.12	# Initial clauses in saturation        : 6028
5.92/6.12	# Processed clauses                    : 8339
5.92/6.12	# ...of these trivial                  : 74
5.92/6.12	# ...subsumed                          : 415
5.92/6.12	# ...remaining for further processing  : 7850
5.92/6.12	# Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 11802
5.92/6.12	# Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
5.92/6.12	# Backward-subsumed                    : 4
5.92/6.12	# Backward-rewritten                   : 23
5.92/6.12	# Generated clauses                    : 97382
5.92/6.12	# ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 85133
5.92/6.12	# Contextual simplify-reflections      : 12
5.92/6.12	# Paramodulations                      : 72583
5.92/6.12	# Factorizations                       : 0
5.92/6.12	# NegExts                              : 0
5.92/6.12	# Equation resolutions                 : 11836
5.92/6.12	# Propositional unsat checks           : 0
5.92/6.12	#    Propositional check models        : 0
5.92/6.12	#    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
5.92/6.12	#    Propositional clauses             : 0
5.92/6.12	#    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
5.92/6.12	#    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
5.92/6.12	#    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
5.92/6.12	#    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
5.92/6.12	#    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
5.92/6.12	#    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
5.92/6.12	#    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
5.92/6.12	#    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
5.92/6.12	# Current number of processed clauses  : 2006
5.92/6.12	#    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 744
5.92/6.12	#    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 30
5.92/6.12	#    Negative unit clauses             : 34
5.92/6.12	#    Non-unit-clauses                  : 1198
5.92/6.12	# Current number of unprocessed clauses: 88257
5.92/6.12	# ...number of literals in the above   : 357307
5.92/6.12	# Current number of archived formulas  : 0
5.92/6.12	# Current number of archived clauses   : 5514
5.92/6.12	# Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 5157811
5.92/6.12	# Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 280078
5.92/6.12	# Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 408
5.92/6.12	# Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 13716
5.92/6.12	# Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 4
5.92/6.12	# BW rewrite match attempts            : 46409
5.92/6.12	# BW rewrite match successes           : 193
5.92/6.12	# Condensation attempts                : 0
5.92/6.12	# Condensation successes               : 0
5.92/6.12	# Termbank termtop insertions          : 2995360
5.92/6.13	
5.92/6.13	# -------------------------------------------------
5.92/6.13	# User time                : 5.117 s
5.92/6.13	# System time              : 0.105 s
5.92/6.13	# Total time               : 5.222 s
5.92/6.13	# Maximum resident set size: 10424 pages
5.92/6.14	EOF
